![]() ![]() Option 2 would seem to explain why we don't see much anti-matter (it all went into energy). Decrease in entropy (and therefore increase in entropy in its own time(.Increase in entropy (and therefore decrease in entropy in its own time).There is a sense wherein antimatter is "matter going backwards", but not through time.įrom a matter-based observer does antimatter: If you go round it backwards, it has an anticlockwise rotation. When a given quantity of energy is transferred as heat, the change in entropy is large if the transfer occurs at a low temperature and small if the temperature. If you go round the strip one way, it has a clockwise rotation. It's essentially a Möbius strip, which is chiral. Have a look at the picture of a spinor here. Whilst one can mathematically model the positron as a "time reversed electron", it isn't actually going backwards through time. Antimatter is like matter, but it has the opposite chirality. ![]() Whilst that idea might appear to have some pedigree, (see retrocausality on Wikipedia), it's bunk I'm afraid. Thus, the entropy decreases.Antimatter is matter going backwards through time. There is more mixing involved, but the atoms of the gas go from being completely separated from each other to being closely packed with each other and the solvent. condensation, which involves the transformation of a gas to a liquid state and. Conversely, if the system change involves a decrease in entropy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |